Categories
Thoughts & Insights

Top 5 Communication Tactics and Strategies

Embracing new media formats for communicating change fosters greater collaboration, boosts engagement, and mitigates resistance from team members. While emails remain valuable, they should be used judiciously for effectiveness. The key lies in selecting suitable communication methods based on specific objectives and the target audience, ensuring relevant colleagues are included or tagged. Accommodating the communication preferences of employees and team members is vital, as some may prefer traditional channels while others engage more with newer media. Leveraging these media for change communication helps keep employers and employees informed about work and changes without disrupting the workflow.

Comparative Analysis of Communication and Collaboration Tools

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams, part of the Microsoft 365 suite, is designed to facilitate communication and collaboration, especially for remote or distributed teams.

Cost: Options range from free to monthly subscriptions (Microsoft Teams Essentials at $4/month, Microsoft 365 Business Basic at $6/month, and Microsoft 365 Business Standard at $12.50/month).

Pros:
  • User-Friendly Interface: Known for its ease of use and familiar layout, especially for those already using Microsoft products.
  • Full Integration with Microsoft 365: Seamless compatibility with Microsoft Office tools like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint.
  • External Collaboration: Allows guest access, facilitating collaboration with users from other organizations.
  • Diverse Communication Options: Includes chat, video calls, and task management features.
Cons:
  • Limited External User Functionality: External users may face restricted capabilities compared to internal users.
  • Notification Overload: Can generate a significant number of notifications, potentially leading to information overload.
  • Navigation Complexity: Some features, like accessing recordings, can be less intuitive and require navigating through various tabs.
Summary

Microsoft Teams is an excellent choice for organizations deeply integrated with Microsoft 365. It is particularly useful for project launches, corporate communications, and real-time collaboration through chat and video. However, its performance can be demanding on system resources, and navigating some of its features might require a learning curve. It is most effective in transformational and transitional change management scenarios.

Discord

Discord is a chat app allowing users to create private servers with multiple channels for text, voice, photo, or video messages.

Cost: Free

Pros:
  • Community Building: Ideal for creating spaces with various interest channels, enhancing community interaction.
  • Live Streaming Capabilities: Offers the ability for live streaming to a server audience.
  • Diverse Interaction Methods: Supports voice, video calls, and live chat boxes for real-time engagement.
Cons:
  • Gaming Association: Primarily designed for gaming communities, which might not align with all professional environments.
  • Complex Interface: Can be overwhelming for new users due to its many features and functionalities.
  • Limited Professional Tools: Does not offer built-in task management or business-oriented tools.
Summary

Discord is an excellent tool for quick, continuous collaboration and is especially beneficial in times of remote work and dynamic project environments. It is best suited for developmental change management, such as in projects focused on continuous improvement, team development, and problem-solving.

Slack

Slack is a centralized platform for team communication, collaboration, and file sharing, popular in professional settings.

Cost: Free and Paid options (Slack Pro at $7.25/month, Business+ at $12.50/month).

Pros:
  • Real-Time Communication: Facilitates instant messaging and quick connections between team members.
  • Robust Security: Implements measures like two-factor authentication and data encryption.
  • File Sharing and Integration: Supports various file types and integrates with cloud storage and other services.
  • Organized Conversations: Uses channels to help organize discussions by topic or project.
Cons:
  • Information Overload: The constant message flow can lead to distractions and overwhelm.
  • Initial Complexity: New users might find the interface and features a bit daunting at first.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity: Requires a stable internet connection for optimal performance.
Summary

Slack is particularly effective for teams needing a fast, reliable communication platform with strong file-sharing capabilities. It is well-suited for developmental change management, facilitating enhanced sales, quality improvements, and team collaboration. Its integration with various apps makes it a versatile tool for centralized communication.

Workvivo

Workvivo is a Zoom powered platform designed to connect and engage employees, improving organizational communication.

Cost: Paid (requires a sales quote)

Pros:
  • Comprehensive Collaboration Tools: Offers messaging, file sharing, video conferencing, and whiteboarding.
  • Seamless Integration: Integrates with Cisco Webex Meetings for smooth transitions between messaging and video conferencing.
  • Strong Emphasis on Security: Features end-to-end encryption for messaging, secure file sharing, and compliance with industry standards.
  • Scalability: Designed to meet the needs of both small teams and large enterprises.
  • Third-Party Application Integration: Supports integration with various workflow tools to enhance productivity.
  • Employee Engagement Features: Includes recognition programs, employee profiles, and social interaction tools.
  • Customization Options: Allows organizations to tailor the platform to their specific needs and branding.
  • Integration with Other Tools: Provides a seamless user experience through integration with various systems.
  • Mobile Accessibility: Offers mobile apps for connectivity on the go.
Cons:
  • Cost Consideration: Depending on the organization’s size and required features, the cost could be significant.
  • Potential Resistance to Adoption: Employees comfortable with existing methods may resist the introduction of a new tool where comparative tools already exist.
  • Privacy Concerns: Sharing information within the organization raises questions about data security.
  • Integration with Third Party platforms: While possible, it is not straightforward to implement. The platform works best in an organization that uses Zoom as their primary virtual meeting tool.
Summary

Workvivo excels in creating a collaborative platform that respects individual identity and contributions, focusing on intrinsic motivators. It is ideal for scenarios where enhancing sales, quality, and team development are key objectives. Its emphasis on intrinsic motivation makes it a valuable tool for developmental change management, especially in remote work environments.

Cisco Webex Teams

Cisco Webex Teams supports real-time and asynchronous communication, suitable for remote teams.

Cost: Free and paid options (Webex Starter at $19/month, Webex Business at $26/month).

Pros:
  • Comprehensive Collaboration Tools: Offers messaging, file sharing, video conferencing, and whiteboarding.
  • Seamless Integration: Integrates with Cisco Webex Meetings for smooth transitions between messaging and video conferencing.
  • Strong Emphasis on Security: Features end-to-end encryption for messaging, secure file sharing, and compliance with industry standards.
  • Scalability: Designed to meet the needs of both small teams and large enterprises.
  • Third-Party Application Integration: Supports integration with various workflow tools to enhance productivity.
Cons:
  • Learning Curve: The platform’s various features and functionalities may initially be complex for some users.
  • Resource-Intensive: Can be demanding on devices with limited processing power, especially during video conferencing.
  • Limited Customization: May not offer extensive customization options for interface appearance and organization.
  • User Experience: Streamlining the interface for simplicity could be challenging for those seeking an intuitive user experience.
  • Integration with Third Party platforms: While possible, it is not straightforward to implement. The platform works best in an organization that uses WebEx as their primary virtual meeting tool.
Summary

Cisco Webex Teams is a versatile platform that combines calling, meeting, messaging, polling, and events. It includes People Insights, a feature providing anonymized data around meetings to help managers gauge team engagement and collaboration dynamics. Positioned between Zoom and Microsoft Teams, Webex integrates more than the former but doesn’t encompass an all-in-one productivity tool like the latter. It is particularly effective for transformational and transitional change management, facilitating detailed discussions on change and supporting necessary calls and meetings.

Navigating change is an inherently complex and imperfect process, often met with varying degrees of acceptance among employees. However, the manner in which organizations communicate these changes can play a pivotal role in shaping employee perceptions and responses. By thoughtfully selecting and utilizing communication platforms that align with a company’s values and culture, there’s potential to foster a more open and receptive attitude towards change. This approach can encourage employees to not only accept change but also actively contribute positively to the evolving dynamics of the team and organization.

We recognize that the landscape of communication tools is diverse and constantly evolving. As such, we are curious to learn about your experiences and perspectives: What adjustments do you find critical in communicating organizational changes? Your insights are valuable, and we invite you to share them in the comments section. Let’s continue this conversation and exchange ideas on platforms like Twitter and LinkedIn, where we can collectively explore effective strategies for managing change in our workplaces.

Resources:
Comparative Analysis of Communication and Collaboration Tools

Assessing Features and Functionalities of Key Platforms for Organizational Change Management

Categories
Thoughts & Insights

Mastering Change: Effective Communication as the Key to Change Management

Change is often challenging for individuals because they tend to prefer a comfortable and predictable state. While this minimizes risk, it also can disconnect us from the present moment. We become less receptive to change-related messages. We’ve all felt this before; have you ever arrived at a destination without consciously considering the route? Perhaps missing a more efficient path. This automatic mode (or “auto-pilot”), while comfortable, often blinds us to innovative possibilities and hinders our ability to adapt to new, potentially better ways of doing things. This auto-pilot state is evolutionary in nature, it allows us to dedicate less cognitive effort and frees up capacity for other activities, talking with your partner in the car and listening to music. We like our auto-pilot state, it’s why people resist change so much. Change requires a significant amount of cognitive effort and introduces feelings of discomfort, unfamiliarity, and fear of the unknown. We associate change with loss and added effort, no wonder we resist it.

We can all agree that communication is the cornerstone of engagement, yet it is often met with resistance. We have to remember that our employees come from different backgrounds, departments, and levels of experience, they are individuals, unique in every aspect, including how they prefer to receive information. Some might favor direct emails, while others might respond better to interactive platforms like Slack or Teams. Furthermore, the tone, format, and detail can resonate differently across these groups. Recognizing and respecting these nuances is crucial. For instance, a young, tech-savvy team might appreciate concise digital updates, whereas a more traditional group might value detailed reports or face-to-face meetings. Tailoring communication strategies to suit these diverse preferences is not just about delivering a message; it’s about ensuring the message is received, understood, and acted upon. When change initiatives fail, it’s often not due to the change itself, but rather to a gap in how and what we communicate to those who are being impacted. Ultimately, the goal is not just to check a box and send out information timely; it’s about fostering a deeper understanding of what is going to happen and inspire action amongst those who are being asked to change the way they do things moving forward.

The most important messages to communicate depend on a number of factors. It depends on who you’re communicating to, what you’re communicating about, the internal and external landscape that is surrounding the change and so much more. It’s why here at Reroute Consulting we advocated for a targeted approach to how we communicate our messages. We spend time getting to know the business, it’s stakeholders and those who will be impacted by the change. Does it take more time? Yes. Do we always get the intended results? Sometimes. We are after all dealing with people, there is no such thing as a guaranteed solution in managing change. This concept of complexity is explored in more detail in our article, Complexity and Change Management.

While there is no playbook we can follow, there are some guiding principles based on several years of research. In general, employees want to hear organizational related messaging from the top, from the CEO/President of the firm. However, personal messages, such as how my day-to-day activities will be changing as the result of a change, not surprisingly require a personal touch; employee prefer to hear these messages from their direct supervisor/leader.

When we consider the messaging, employees typically want answers to five fundamental questions:

  1. How will this change impact me?
  2. Why is this change happening?
  3. Why should I care?
  4. What will the future look like?
  5. How will we get there?

Leaders, including our senior leaders. want similar messaging, with one additional piece: what will their role be in managing the change. In other words, what are they expected to do to help support the change. This has many facets to it, it includes, but is not limited to, the following:

  1. How and what should we communicate to our employees?
  2. What are the key messages we should be sharing with employees?
  3. Where do I go to get the information I need and who do I contact for support?

These are things you can control; identifying your audience, targeting the message to a particular group, identifying who is best to send it out and determining what the message will say. The difficulty comes in trying to encourage motivation, understanding and engagement about the change, This has always been a challenge and it’s getting harder over time. There are so many distractions today, while many of us in the field seek to achieve 80% readership, we’re lucky if we get 20% of our readers to read a message we send in it’s entirety. It’s our firm belief here at Reroute Consulting, that the challenge lies not in the change itself but in how it’s conveyed to employees. We don’t think that people hate change, full stop. People are far more complex to enable us to make such a prevailing assumption. We think the gap is in how we approach communication strategy that needs an overhaul. In our experience, less formal messaging, with the primary goal of encouraging collaboration and transparency yields the highest likelihood for success.

Are you feeling a bit discouraged, feeling like there is no such thing as an effective communication strategy; there are just too many variables that need to be considered and who has the resources to ensure that we dot every ‘i’ and cross every ‘t.’ You know we wouldn’t do that to you. There is a light at the end of the tunnel and a two actionable solutions to help you design, develop and deliver effective communications.

First, effective communications requires the support of our people leaders. Leaders are crucial to helping customize the messaging to meet the specific needs of their employees, they are best equip to tailor a standard message to their team so it resonates. They are also better equipped to provide employees with the space they need to express their concerns and questions, and this space is crucial to driving engagement. Leaders should be receptive to their employees concerns, even resistance, ensuring that they feel comfortable to share their grievances so that they can tackle them head on instead of having these feelings linger in silence only to come up later, stronger and more disruptive in nature. There are many tactics leaders can use to help manage employee resistance.

Second, given the inherent unpredictability of change, it is also important that we continuously monitor, learn from, and adjust our approach to managing the change as necessary. This includes how we communicate details of the change. This process is easier said than done, it requires a willingness to receive feedback from employees and, more importantly, actually do something about the feedback received. It isn’t always easy to operationalize, but giving employees a voice will work wonders to drive the level of motivation, understanding and engagement we all want to see when introducing a change, an investment in maintaining open lines of communication, transparency and collaboration will always yield dividends, if you can commit to taking the necessary action based on the information received. This means sometimes going back to the drawing board and starting over.

Change will never be flawless, and employees may never fully embrace it. However, by altering the way we communicate change to our employees, can have a significant impact on our ability to introduce a successful change.

Read our follow up article for a list of the top 5 communication tactics and strategies we’ve used in practice to improve our ability to drive motivation, understanding and engagement for our clients.